![]() The psychological secret of this act lies in its double character of being both wholly personal and wholly impersonal” (131). See Wolff, The Sociology of Georg Simmel: “On the one hand, sexual intercourse is the most intimate and personal process, but on the other hand, it is absolutely general, absorbing the very personality in the service of the species and in the universal organic claim of nature. Jacobs, and Mathew Kanjirathinkal (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009). Simmel, Sociology: Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms, trans. Rüdiger Lautmann, Soziologie der Sexualität (Weinheim: Juventa, 2002). See, e.g., the article “Erotik” or “Geschlechtsmerkmale.” Max Marcuse, ed., Handwörterbuch der Sexualwissenschaft (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2001). See Simmel “Female Culture,” Georg Simmel: On Women, Sexuality and Love (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984). Theoretical Assessments from the French Tradition (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018), 22. See Wolff, The Sociology of Georg Simmel.Ĭhristian Papilloud, Sociology through Relation. See Simmel, “Flirtation,” Georg Simmel: On Women, Sexuality and Love (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984). Instead, intimates are motivated and held together by the ideal and sometimes fantastic construction of their relationship. This dialectical paradigm of love does not follow strict, objective rules. In erotic love, partners unconsciously lose their former selves in each other by creating each other anew. He examines Simmel’s “Digression about the sociology of the senses,” which explains the effects of “reciprocal perception” and provides clues for a relevant research program that still needs to be carried out in order to confirm that intimate relations are mainly sensory and emotional. Following Simmel’s phenomenological method, Davis analyzes the psychological factors by which intimacy evolves. An exception to be noted is a work by Murray S. In view of Simmel’s assertion in his essay on flirtation that “the relationship between the sexes provides the prototype for countless relationships between the individual and the interindividual life”, it is surprising that this central relationship in social life has remained largely neglected by sociologists. Generally speaking, erotic interaction is not in the focus of Simmel’s reception, neither in Germany nor in America. In American sociology, Simmel is present especially through the mediation of Robert Ezra Park, who specified that the leading idea of sociology was to describe forms of social interaction, including the function of these forms. The higher forms of sociation are widely discussed. ![]() The former chapter dealt with the high level of patterns of culture we will now take a step down in this chapter to the basis of all levels of existence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |